Nice jacket.

The Masters lived up to its billing; that was quite a back 9 plus 1. But let's make one thing perfectly clear-- this does not mean that "the old Tiger is back!"

I hate to interupt the green-jacketed circle-jerk, but the "old Tiger" wouldn't have blown a three-shot lead on the back 9 and been forced to win it in a playoff.

The "old Tiger" would have won it going away, with a 33 on the back 9 and a four-plus shot margin.

Let's save the hand jobs until he wins another couple majors, mmmkay? (Jim Nantz, I'm looking in your direction)