Not that it was a major part of my blogging experience, but
the Friday Five has died. Its probably a good thing, though, since I was always looking for ways out of answering the given questions, and it turns everyone's blog into the same sort of deal one day a week. I've even noticed some takeoffs on the idea, but its all the same effect.
So, after searching through my archives, and seeing the Maurice Clarett "interview" I did
in August, I thought to myself, "Self, wouldn't it be fun to do that more often?" And while I don't often talk to myself, and agree much less than that, even, I decided to fake more interviews. You creative types out there, feel free to play along. This will be like my "Friday Five", just not quite 5, and more random than on a Friday.
First up:
10 Questions for John Ashcroft. (From
Salon.com, sometime last month, its not a REAL interview, just what they think the 9/11 commission should have asked John Ashcroft. Of course, I'm providing how he SHOULD have answered what they SHOULD have asked him. Follow?)
1) If counterterrorism was a top priority for the Justice Department prior to 9/11, why did Ashcroft ignore the FBI's specific request in August 2001 for additional counterterrorism resources? If I recall correctly, Mr. Chairman, the FBI submitted their request on plain white paper. It is clearly listed in both the "Super Secret Government Handbook on Procedure and How to do Things", that FBI requests must be submitted on YELLOW paper, and preferably not signed in crayon by the 5 year old daughter of the FBI Director.
2) Why wasn't counterterrorism one of the seven strategic goals Ashcroft outlined in a May 2001 memo to his division heads? I have division heads? Whoa.
I guess if I had known that back then, I probably would have included something about counterterrorism, though I distinctly remember burning my left index finger that morning trying to get a Pop-Tart unstuck in the toaster. Typing at all was difficult, but do you realize how many "t's" and "r's" there are in "counterterrorism"? Alot of them. There's no way I was going to put my poor finger through that.
Besides, if you would have read the seven goals I *did* include in the memo, where would counterterrorism fit in? I probably could have made it into an eight goal memo, but do you realize the paper that would be wasted by the extra copies of an EIGHTH goal? It could cost the company hundreds!
3) Between Jan. 20 and Sept. 11, 2001, were the FBI field offices instructed to increase surveillance of known suspected terrorists? If so, why hasn't Ashcroft been able to provide any evidence to the commission proving it? Yes, in fact, they were. And I have evidence, though most of the surveillance tapes have been taped over with late night Cinemax movies. But some of them are still there, um, I think.
4) After 9/11, why did Ashcroft slash almost $1 billion from an emergency FBI request to bolster counterterrorism efforts? Oh, it was only about $850 million. Don't you people read? I mean jeez, you want me to have evidence of this, and answers for that, and send out a memo about blah, blah, blah. Don't you ever get tired of hearing yourselves talk? Besides, it was only a billion dollars. They spend at least half of that on donuts and pencils. Have you ever seen the donuts the FBI eats? So soft and sweet and warm. They have these ones with chocolate on the inside. You gotta get to them quick, though, because they go first. Sooooo full of chocolatey goodness. I saw that bastard Donovan take two of them last week! TWO! And you still think they deserve that extra billion dollars? For what, coffee creamer?
5) Beginning in the summer of 2001, Ashcroft stopped flying commercial airlines and traveled exclusively by private jet because of an FBI "threat assessment." What, exactly, did the threat assessment say? Why is the threat assessment still being withheld from the public? It said, and I quote, "If you value your ass, find a private jet." Hey, I've got money. I've got connections. Why do I want to fly in some seedy 747 with that whiny, smelly, back of my seat-kicking brat that I ALWAYS sit in front of, when I can ride in style, visit the cockpit to do a few lines with the pilots, and land where ever we damn well please, because I'm John Ashcroft?
And nothing is being held from the public. If those poor bastards want to be safe, then make some money and buy a jet. Oooh, um, maybe you better strike that one from the record.
6) Does Ashcroft regret the treatment of the 762 innocent foreign men detained by the federal government in the US for months after 9/11? Does Ashcroft think those men -- many of whom were subject to verbal and physical abuse and had their due process rights violated -- deserve an apology? Hey, at least they're not in an Iraqi prison. Whoa, did you see how Rumsfeld blew that one? I mean, our prisoners got beat around a little, and I'm sure there was more than their fair share of sodomy going on, but at least we didn't take pictures of it! You should see Rummy's desktop on his computer. Ha! If you thought that picture of the guy with drawers on his face was bad, you ain't seen nothing!
7) In Oct. 2001, Ashcroft appeared with President Bush at a press conference to unveil a list of 22 "most wanted terrorists." Thirty months later at least 20 of those individuals are still at large. Why is the war on terrorism lagging? Let me draw you a map. *Pulling out a big piece of paper and some Crayola markers* This is the world. Somewhere on this map, there are 20 people. These 20 people like to live in holes. Do you know how many holes there are in the world? Alot. This isn't as easy as finding a coed in the bottom of a river, Senator Kennedy.
8) Why, in the days after 9/11, did Ashcroft, along with White House and State Department officials, allow two dozen members of the bin Laden and Saudi royal families to circumvent FAA restrictions forbidding flights and leave the country without full FBI questioning? It took a good month for us to settle into a quality racial profiling plan. These folks knew it was time to go and ducked out before we as Americans learned that people of Arab descent aren't to be trusted. If they would have waited 3 or 4 more days to take that flight back to the Middle East, I guarantee you we would have showered them with harrassing stares and anti-Arab remarks.
9) Condoleezza Rice testified that, during the summer of 2001, "there were 70 full field investigations underway of [al-Qaida] cells." Why didn't Ashcroft demand that the National Security Adviser organize daily meetings at the White House of the highest officials with national security responsibility, including himself, to force information from the bureaucracy to the top and locate the terrorist threat? Why did Ashcroft not raise the subject of those field investigations at the one Principals Meeting of national security officials that discussed terrorism (specifically, the Predator drone aircraft) before 9/11? Whoa, whoa. One question at a time here. Besides, isn't my hour almost up? I'm meeting Rumsfeld at the China Buffet at 12:15, and you know how traffic is these days. Oh, and if you think Condoleezza can *count* to 70 without breaking out a calculator, you've got some more fact finding to do.
10) If there were structural impediments to information sharing among federal agencies prior to 9/11, why did you testify under oath before the Congress in May 2001 that the National Security Council was a "highly effective instrument" in coordinating federal agencies dealing with counterterrorism? "Highly effective instrument"... ah, THAT nickname brings back memories. But as far as anything with the NSC goes, just because something is "highly effective" doesn't mean it works. An ice cube is highly effective in a glass of water, but if you think its going to help keep me cool next to the pool at my South Beach condo, you're sadly mistaken.
Now, if you're all finished, I'd just like to say thank you for your time, and... I'm John Ashcroft, biatch!