I'm going to go on record right now and note that ESPN.com sucks. I was a solid 4 paragraphs into this post, but one of their full screen ads popped up and bit me in the proverbial ass. Something about a Dr. Watson log file. Its happened before, and I've avoided it. Not just Dr. Watson and his log, but the whole damn site. Giving the "worldwide leader" a second chance, I went back. I was actually cool with the information I needed, then when I went find out which "Former NHL official was accused with impropriety", and exactly what kind of impropriety was involved, it got me. If they didn't frown upon downloads at work, I'd have a pop-up blocker on here so fast, it would make their head spin. Of course, I'd also have a load of cool games and some good Asian porn, but they might frown upon that. So, I guess I'll have to learn to live my life at work without ESPN.com, until I can be convinced that the shenanigans they use to promote random acts of crap are gone. In the words of Alexander Graham Bell, "Watson, come here, I want you to kiss my ass!"
Now, on to what I came here with. According to
Netscape, I'm going to live until 75. Of course, they haven't taken into consideration any wagers, benders or knife-fights with monkeys I might get into, and they've hardly thought about any cures for a hardened liver or "invincibility bubbles", but 75 sounds about right.
Of course, what it REALLY means is the Browns have 44 years, 1 month and 7 days to win a Super Bowl. Butch Davis, you're on the clock.
*******
So it looks like the glimmer of hope that the Cavs were going to pull off a deal to keep Carlos Boozer in town
has pretty much faded. In a way, this is good, because I'd feel bad if I had to pull a 180 and cheer for a man(?) I've referred to as a "two-faced" little punk. And that's the PG version!
But now that he's on his way to the Great Salt Lake, I feel safe in reiterating my claim that he contracts syphilis. And soon.
******
This just in, apparently not only are the Democrats going to screw us if they get elected, they'd want us to
pay for it, too!
*insert rimshot here*
But seriously, its good to see that Bobby Valentine is doing well for himself in the Witness Protection Program.
And I think I see the problem, its all in this quote:
"Charles Kushner is one of the most respected business leaders in the community and widely known as a very generous philanthropist," Brafman said in a statement.
I think the word he was looking for is
philanderer. Never underestimate the power of a good vocabulary, kids.
*******
Congrats to Alfonso Soriano on taking the All-Star MVP award last night in Houston. Of course, he should have been the second straight Ranger to win the award, but apparently, game winning homers off of the surest thing coming out of a bullpen since Morganna (Hi-Yo!) isn't enough for that honor.
For the record, that is the second Julio Franco trivia question Soriano has taken away from me in a week. Not that I mind, though, as long as he keeps winning ball games. (Incidentally, the "most HR by a Rangers second baseman" record he set last week also likely broke the record for most HR in a season by a Ranger who's first and last name both ended in "o", but I'll have to look that up.
It's a good thing Soriano took home the MVP, it made up for Hank Blalock and Michael Young (despite an outstanding play at shortstop) hanging up an 0-for-4 collar, and Francisco Cordero and Kenny Rogers not making an appearance. I guess that's what happens when you give up 4 dozen runs in one-plus to the Red Sox, eh Kenny?
******
Not only have I not seen
Anchorman yet, I'm not sure that I want to. Or at least not before its on an HBO "marathon". I think I'm the only person on the planet who, while thinking Will Ferrell is funny, he's not wet-yourself-at-his-every-breath funny. Maybe he's just got that played out SNL thing going on (I felt the same way about Chris Farley, Dana Carvey, and to an extent Adam Sandler and Mike Myers at one point. Oh, and David Spade has NEVER been funny, even before his whiny little bitch routine was shoved down our throats.), but I just don't see it some times. That and I've lived the TV newsroom life for 8+ years now, I don't need anyone to tell me how arrogant some talent can be. (Note, I said "some". Not all, SOME. That is to say, if you're reading this and know me and have/do/will work with me, I think you're great! If not, you're probably one of "them".)
Anyway, the biggest thing I'm taking from the previews of
Anchorman is that I hope to God in the next four years the SAT doesn't have a question like "Vince Vaughn:Will Ferrell::Jeremy Piven:John Cusack". That would make me sad. Not only does Vaughn seem to be running off the same roles more and more frequently anyway, but to be cast in another's shadow would be a travesty.
*******
Finally (I think... it was a long weekend, I kept thinking of things, sorry!), I have to point out that in the comments to my previous post,
my brother does a spot-on impression of ESPN's Steven A. Smith. He tries to pass it off as an impression of Scott Van Pelt doing an impression of Steven A. Smith, but why include the middle man? Its damn good.